
From Christianity Today
here, is a fantastic interview with Ben Witherington III. I really need to get his book
The Problem with Evangelical Theology. Here's how Dr. Witherington describes the problem:
It (evangelical theology) has exegetical weaknesses that are not recognized or owned up to by the various evangelical Protestant strains of theology. That's what it boils down to...
The issue is not really with Christology, the Trinity, the virginal conception, the bodily resurrection of Jesus, or the Bible as the Word of God. The issues I'm concerned about are the distinctives of Calvinist, Arminian, dispensational, or Pentecostal theology. When they try to go some particular direction that's specific to their theological system, that's precisely the point in their argument at which they are exegetically weakest.
Books like this give someone like me hope. I have long struggled with the theological distinctives in each theological stream. I am from a reformed
presbyterian background, but I am not
Calvinist enough for most Calvinists. My parents and grandparents grew up in the
Assemblies of God and we attended until I was in sixth grade. Yet many of the pentecostal distinctives do not resonate with me. (Though I greatly respect
my cousin's beliefs and scholarly insights!)
I have found it difficult to find a theological home in which to minister. Initially this is what attracted me to the
Christian Church (Disciples of Christ). But they are "so
open minded that their brains leaked out" (
Steve Taylor, Whatcha Gonna Do When Your Numbers Up).
So are there any good theological homes for a mutt like me?
Witherington argues that postmodernism presents us with a "new opportunity to re-engage the biblical text, which is trying to present word pictures and stories to a world that wants not just answers to its questions, but also its imagination fired up."
These observations are especially poignant:
We have to remember that those who wrote the Bible were not late-Western Christians suffering from post-Enlightenment psychoses. These were people who lived in storied worlds, in an oral culture where storytelling was the essence of the thing. Most people in that culture were not even literate. They didn't live in a world bound by texts.
The Bible was not written in a text-oriented culture but for an oral culture. So these documents were meant to be heard. When you read them out loud in Greek, you notice alliteration and poetry and all kinds of things going on that are totally lost in translation. I think the oral dimension of the biblical world, very much connected to storytelling, is a crucial dimension and is a key to understanding the theology in those texts.
So a question for you all: Is Witherington on to something here? If so, how can we become more faithful to what the Bible teaches? Does postmodernism truly represent a new opportunity to be more faithful to what the Bible teaches as opposed to doctrinal distinctives?
Filed in:
theology,
hermeneutics